Legal Opinion
Cherun v. Frishman
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided December 11, 1964No. Civ. A. 1719-64PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TAMM, District Judge.
This case is before the Court on cross motions by both the plaintiff and the defendant for summary judgment.
The plaintiff, Alex Cherun, has brought this action upon a judgment which he recovered against the defendant, Bernard Lyon Frishman, in the amount of $73,-353.26 on January 14, 1964, in the Supreme Court of Ontario, Dominion of Canada.
The defendant first denies that the judgment was an in personam money judgment against him, and second, he asserts that if the judgment be considered as in personam the Supreme Court of Ontario lacked personal jurisdiction over the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Milliken v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Tahan v. HodgsonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1981
- Bank of Montreal, a Foreign Corporation v. Jack Kough, AKA John Keller KoughCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Hunt v. BP Exploration Co.(Libya) Ltd.District Court, N.D. Texas · 1980
- Brinco Mining Ltd. v. Federal InsuranceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1982
- Logiurato v. ActionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1980
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.