Legal Opinion
Turvene v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided February 3, 1988No. 86-87CPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
NETTESHEIM, Judge.
Defendant has moved to dismiss plaintiffs claim under the Back Pay Act, 5 U.S.C. § 5596(b)(1) (1982), for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Plaintiff has opposed, and argument has been held.
FACTS
The following facts are undisputed. Robert E. Turvene (“plaintiff”), formerly employed as an Education Program Specialist with the Department of Education (the “Department”), in December 1984 initiated his voluntary retirement under the Civil Service. During this time plaintiff met with the Department’s personnel office, which reviewed his employment record and determined…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. FaustoSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- The United States v. Patrick J. ConnollyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Elias Covington v. Department of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Margaret J. Schultz v. United States NavyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Bell v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1991
- Wise v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1989