Legal Opinion

People v. Hill

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided January 16, 1973No. Docket 12101PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJ. H. Gillis, J.

Defendant was convicted of armed robbery. MCLA 750.529; MSA 28.797. On appeal we affirm.

On May 14, 1968, two men entered a store owned by Robert Hamel, forced him, his employees, and customers to lie on the floor at gunpoint, took the money from the cash registers, and fled. Defendant was later identified by Mr. Hamel, apparently from a photograph, and police sought and obtained a warrant for his arrest.

The complaint 1 which provided the basis for the arrest contained a bare recitation of the crime in the statutory language. It named the defendant as the perpetrator, and was signed by the…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. United States v. VentrescaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. People v. ShollMichigan Supreme Court · 1996
  2. People v. SherbineMichigan Supreme Court · 1985
  3. People v. BurrillMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
  4. People v. TrudeauMichigan Court of Appeals · 1974
  5. People v. MayberryMichigan Court of Appeals · 1974

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API