Legal Opinion

United States v. William Allen Arnold

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided August 17, 2005No. 03-12810Unpublished

Non-Argument Calendar.

1Opinion of the Court

ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

2Per curiam

The appeal of William Allen Arnold, pro se, is again before us, following a remand from the Supreme Court of the United States for further consideration in light of United States v. Booker, — U.S. -, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005). See Arnold v. United States, — U.S. -, 125 S.Ct. 2527, — L.Ed.2d - (2005). We previously affirmed Arnold’s conviction and twelve-month sentence for conspiring to defraud the United States, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371. United States v. Arnold, 125 Fed.Appx. 269 (11th Cir.2004). After review, we conclude…

3Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. United States v. RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
  5. United States v. Avonda Vanay DowlingCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API