Legal Opinion

Williams v. Union Pac. R. Co.

District Court, D. Nebraska

Decided October 9, 1950No. Civ. No. 24-50PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DELEHANT, District Judge.

Ruling is now made upon a motion by the defendant for an order requiring the inclusion as additional parties plaintiff to this action of fifteen corporations engaged in the business of insurance against loss by fire and other casualties in connection with the first count of the complaint, and one of these several corporations only, in connection with each of its second and third counts. The setting in which the motion is tendered may be explained briefly.

In his petition filed in the District Court of Jefferson County, Nebraska, the plaintiff, on the alleged ground of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. United States v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Luckenbach v. W. J. McCahan Sugar Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
  3. Union Pacific Railroad v. Mason City & Fort Dodge RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  4. Brown v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
  5. The KimballSupreme Court of the United States · 1866

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Bolton v. ZieglerDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1953
  2. American Province of the Servants of Mary Real Estate Corp. v. Metropolitan Utilities DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Fix Fuel and Material Company, a Corporation v. Wabash Railroad Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1957
  4. Wattles v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.District Court, D. Nebraska · 1979
  5. Central Nat. Ins. Co. of Omaha v. DixonNevada Supreme Court · 1977

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API