South Carolina Ex Rel. Phoenix Mutual Life Insurance v. McMaster
Supreme Court of the United States
ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP SOUTH CAROLINA. The facts arc stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Day
These cases involve the same questions, and, being practically one proceeding, may be disposed of together. They arise out of an application to the Supreme Court of the State of South Carolina for á writ of mandamus, requiring the respondent, Fitz. H. McMaster, as Insurance Commissioner of the State of South Carolina, to issue to the Phoenix Mutual Life Insurance Company, a corporation of tlje State of Connecticut (hereinafter called the' Phoenix Company), a license to do business in South Carolina as a life insurance company for the year beginning April 1st, 1912, The Supreme Court of the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Barbier v. ConnollySupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Harrison v. St. Louis & San Francisco RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
3Cited by13 opinions
- German-American Coffee Co. v. . DiehlNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
- International Text Book Co. v. . ToneNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
- York Harbor Village Corp. v. LibbySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1928
- Potter v. Dark Tobacco Growers Co-Operative Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1923
- Dark Tobacco Growers' Co-op. Ass'n v. DunnTennessee Supreme Court · 1924
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.