Legal Opinion

(PC) Coston v. Nangalama

District Court, E.D. California

Decided January 31, 2025No. 2:10-cv-02009Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DANIEL MURPHY COSTON, No. 2:10-cv-02009-MCE-EFB (PC) 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. CERTIFICATION OF FACTS AND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE 14 ANDREW NANGALAMA, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 This matter was before the court for hearing on December 18, 2024, on plaintiff’s motion 18 for an order so show cause why California State Prison-Sacramento (CSP-Sac) should not be 19 ordered to pay plaintiff’s attorney’s fees and costs incurred due to CSP-Sac’s violation of court 20 orders. See ECF No. 308. Attorneys Eric Wolff and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Norwood v. VanceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  2. Donovan v. MazzolaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  3. Daniel Coston v. Andrew NangalamaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API