Legal Opinion
Wick v. Superior Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided December 10, 1928No. 87PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Per curiam
The writ of error is dismissed on the authority of § 237 (a) of the Judicial Code, as ¿mended by the act of February 13, 1925 (43 Stat. 936, 937), because the judgment sought to be reviewed is not final within the meaning of this section, however it may be regarded in state procedure; Grays Harbor Logging Co. v. Coates Fordney Logging Co., 243 U. S. 251; Washington ex rel. McPherson *576Bros. Co. v. Superior Court, 274 U. S. 726; Washington ex rel. Terry v. Superior Court, 276 U. S. 626.
Mr. Joseph D. Sullivan for plaintiffs in error. Messrs. F. G. Dorety, Frank. T. Post, Edwin C. Matthias,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Grays Harbor Logging Co. v. Coats-Fordney Logging Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
- State ex rel. McPherson Bros. v. Superior CourtSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
3Cited by7 opinions
- Department of Banking of Neb. v. PinkSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Buscaglia v. District Court of San JuanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1944
- Henry v. McCormack Bros. Motor Car Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1936
- Big Horn Coal Company v. SHERIDAN-WYO. COAL COMPANYWyoming Supreme Court · 1950
- Dillard v. Pittway Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1998
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.