Legal Opinion

Eanes v. Haynes

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 8, 1939No. 1956PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRISSOM, Justice.

Bob Haynes instituted this suit in the County Court of Comanche County against J. R. Eanes, on two promissory notes, one for the principal sum of $30, and the other for the principal sum of $150; said nqtes provide for 10 per cent interest and contain the usual provision for 10 per cent attorney’s fees.

Plaintiff alleged payments aggregating $30 which plaintiff credited on the $30 note. The trial resulted in a judgment for plaintiff against defendant for $235.71. Defendant has appealed. No briefs have been filed. We have inspected the record for fundamental error. Haynes v. J.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Booth v. Texas Employers' InsuranceTexas Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Haynes v. J. F. Radford Grocery CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Baker v. SmelserTexas Supreme Court · 1895
  4. J. I. Case Co. v. LaubhanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
  5. Le Master v. LeeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1912

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Atlas IDF v. NexPoint Real Estate PartnersTexas Business Court · 2025
  2. Smith v. First Nat. Bank in GrovetonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940
  3. Opinion No., Texas Attorney General Reports1985
  4. Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion, Texas Attorney General Reports1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API