Legal Opinion
Cabinet for Health & Family Services v. A.G.G.
Kentucky Supreme Court
Decided April 20, 2006No. 2005-SC-0631-DGEPublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court by
Justice COOPER.
Appellees A.G.G. (“mother”) and W.E.G. (“father”) are the natural parents of two boys, N.E.G., born June 15, 1996, and A.E.G., born January 7, 2001. Following a two-day trial, the Barren Family Court entered judgments terminating the parental rights of the mother and father to the two children and committing the children to the custody of Appellant, Cabinet for Health and Family Services (“CHFS”). The Court of Appeals vacated the judgments and remanded for a new trial, perceiving that the family court judge had admitted improper hearsay evidence in…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Ten Broeck Dupont, Inc. v. BrooksKentucky Supreme Court · 2009
- Jontra Holdings Pty Ltd, an Australian Registered Company Brisbane Angels Nominees Pty Ltd, an Australian Registered Company and Associated Construction Equipment Pty Ltd, an Australian Registered Company v. Gas Sensing Technology Corporation, a Wyoming Corporation D/B/A WelldogWyoming Supreme Court · 2021
- People v. ShifrinColorado Court of Appeals · 2014
- Mattison v. B.B.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
- Alred v. Commonwealth, Judicial Conduct CommissionKentucky Supreme Court · 2012
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.