Legal Opinion

Wonson v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided April 14, 2016No. 12-CF-1433PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Michael Wonson asks us to reverse his two murder convictions because the government failed to present evidence that it maintained custody over the ballistics evidence (multiple cartridge cases and one live round) admitted at trial. Although a crime-scene search technician testified that he collected these items at the scene, and a firearms and toolmark examiner testified that he examined these items, the government never explained how the items made their way from the former to the latter. Instead, the technician who collected the cartridge cases and the live round testified that he gave them…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Irick v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
  4. ALONZO R. VAUGHN and CARL S. MORTON v. UNITED STATESDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2014
  5. Burgess v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Blocker v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2020
  2. State v. EdgarSuperior Court of Delaware · 2016
  3. State v. LewisSuperior Court of Delaware · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API