Legal Opinion
Loreto v. 376 St. Johns Condominium, Inc.
New York Supreme Court
Decided July 2, 2003PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Leon Ruchelsman, J.
The plaintiff moves pursuant to CPLR 3212 for summary judgment on the issue of liability pursuant to Labor Law § 240 (1). The defendants oppose the motion and cross-moved for summary judgment. After reviewing the arguments of all parties this court now makes the following determination.
*792Background
On November 27, 2001 the plaintiff Charles Loreto was working as a laborer for defendant 376 St. Johns Condominium, Inc. preparing the walls and applying wallpaper in the lobby and interior stairway of 376 St. Johns Place in Kings County. The plaintiff created a…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Zuckerman v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Ross v. Curtis-Palmer Hydro-Electric Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1993
- Joblon v. SolowNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
- Mountain View Coach Lines, Inc. v. StormsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Haimes v. New York Telephone Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1978
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Loreto v. 376 St. Johns Condominium, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Munoz v. DJZ Realty, LLCNew York Supreme Court · 2003
- Munoz v. Djz Realty, LLC.New York Supreme Court, Westchester County · 2003