Legal Opinion

Mealey v. Finnegan

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 7, 1891PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal by defendant from an order of the district court for Hennepin county, refusing a new trial after a trial by Hooker, J., and judgment of $2,800 ordered for plaintiff.

1Opinion of the CourtGilfillan, C. J.

The action is on a contract to exchange lands, the plaintiff agreeing to convey to defendant a lot in Minneapolis, and defendant to convey to plaintiff certain lands in Wright county. The complaint states the contract, a tender of performance by plaintiff by his tender of a deed to defendant, and a request by him upon defendant to convey the Wright county lands to him, and a refusal by defendant to accept the deed of plaintiff, or to convey to him the Wright county lands; and also alleges that plaintiff is now ready and willing to perform the contract on his part, and to keep the tender of…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Silcox v. McLeanNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Speed v. McMurraySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  3. Hopkins v. BaremoreSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
  4. Hovelsrud v. HovelsrudSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API