Legal Opinion

Harper Investments, Inc. v. Auditing Division, Utah State Tax Commission

Utah Supreme Court

Decided February 2, 1994No. 920310PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ZIMMERMAN, Chief Justice:

Harper Investments, Inc., Harper Sand and Gravel, Inc., Harper Excavating, Inc., and Harper Contracting, Inc. (collectively referred to as “Harper Companies”), appeal from a decision of the Utah State Tax Commission (“Commission”) that assessed them $582,273.93 in sales taxes arising from the sale of sand and gravel. The Harper Companies argue that this assessment was in error because it did not arise from actual sales, but from an erroneous in-house accounting treatment of the transactions in question. We agree and reverse.

The material facts are not in dispute.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Doyle v. Mitchell Brothers Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
  2. 49th Street Galleria v. Tax Commission, Auditing DivisionCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1993
  3. Board of Equalization v. Utah State Tax Commission Ex Rel. Benchmark, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1993

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Monarrez v. Utah Department of TransportationUtah Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Evans & Sutherland Computer Corp. v. Utah State Tax CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Airport Hilton Ventures, Ltd. v. Utah State Tax CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1999
  4. US Xpress, Inc. v. Utah State Tax CommissionCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1994
  5. Darvish v. Labor Commission Appeals BoardCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2012

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API