Legal Opinion

Dooley v. Procter & Gamble Manufacturing Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 3, 1913PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal by the defendant, the Procter and G-amble Manufacturing Company, from a judgment of the Supreme Court in. favor of the plaintiff, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Richmond on the 22d day of July, 1912, upon the decision of the court after a trial at the Richmond Special Term.

1Opinion of the Court

Burr, J.:

On December 21, 1880, the People of the State of New York, acting through its Commissioners of the Land Office, granted to William R. G-race by letters patent a parcel of land in the town of Northfield at Staten Island in the county of Richmond. The westerly and northerly boundary lines were thus described: “ Commencing at a monument where the westerly boundary of the premises hereby conveyed intersects the southerly shore of the Kill Von Kull and running thence north seventy-seven degrees fifteen minutes east one hundred and fifty feet; thence north fifty degrees twenty minutes east…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Boggs v. Merced Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1859
  2. Lee v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  3. Trustees of the Freeholders & Commonalty of Brookhaven v. SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1907
  4. Moran v. HorskySupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  5. Moores v. . TownshendNew York Court of Appeals · 1886

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Owen v. HubbardCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1970
  2. Talmidov Inc. v. Marina Holding Corp.New York Supreme Court, Kings County · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API