Legal Opinion

Quackenbush v. Superior Court of Santa Barbara County

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 8, 1997No. B104666PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

GILBERT, J.

Here we hold that Insurance Code section 12389 1 does not impose a mandatory duty on the Insurance Commissioner (hereinafter Commissioner) to prohibit an underwritten title company that has violated the Insurance Code from doing business or to warn the public. We issue a writ of mandate directing the trial court to vacate its order overruling the Commissioner’s demurrer to the complaint.

Facts

Francis Kaye Lyons alleged in his amended complaint that Trico Title Insurance Company was an underwritten title company conducting the business of title insurance. (§§ 12340.5, 12340.3.)

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Gray v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. In Re Groundwater CasesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  2. H.N. & Frances C. Berger Foundation v. PerezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
  3. Corona v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  4. Bearden v. Alameda CountyDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2020
  5. Berger Foundation v. PerezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API