Quackenbush v. Superior Court of Santa Barbara County
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
GILBERT, J.
Here we hold that Insurance Code section 12389 1 does not impose a mandatory duty on the Insurance Commissioner (hereinafter Commissioner) to prohibit an underwritten title company that has violated the Insurance Code from doing business or to warn the public. We issue a writ of mandate directing the trial court to vacate its order overruling the Commissioner’s demurrer to the complaint.
Facts
Francis Kaye Lyons alleged in his amended complaint that Trico Title Insurance Company was an underwritten title company conducting the business of title insurance. (§§ 12340.5, 12340.3.)
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Gray v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
3Cited by10 opinions
- In Re Groundwater CasesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- H.N. & Frances C. Berger Foundation v. PerezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- Corona v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- Bearden v. Alameda CountyDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2020
- Berger Foundation v. PerezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.