Corona v. State of California
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
RAMIREZ, P. J.
Plaintiffs and appellants Ray Corona, Sr., and his wife, Arlene Corona, appeal from the trial court’s judgment dismissing their lawsuit after sustaining the demurrer of defendants and respondents State of California, Department of Consumer Affairs, and State Athletic Commission (collectively, the State). Specifically, the Coronas argue the trial court erred when it found that Government Code section 818.4, 1 which applies to discretionary decisions by public officials, applies here to immunize the State from liability. As discussed below, we conclude that California’s…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Morris v. County of MarinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- Haggis v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
- Walt Rankin & Associates, Inc. v. City of MurrietaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- Chaplis v. County of MontereyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
- Gray v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- San Mateo Union High School District v. County of San MateoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013