Legal Opinion

Berg v. Shearer

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided March 5, 1985No. 84-1280PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LAY, Chief Judge.

Charles Berg brought this class action alleging that the Iowa Department of Job Service’s (the Job Service) method of assessing and imposing administrative penalties is both constitutionally and statutorily impermissible. The district court, the Honorable Edward J. McManus presiding, held that the practices of the Job Service violate neither due process rights nor federal statutory requirements. We affirm.

Facts

In April of 1977, Charles Berg filed for Iowa unemployment insurance benefits. Following standard Job Service procedures, Berg sent in a weekly claim card informing the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Fusari v. SteinbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. California Department of Human Resources Development v. JavaSupreme Court of the United States · 1971

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Industrial Commission v. ArteagaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
  2. unempl.ins.rep. Cch 21,867 Tom Cuellar v. Texas Employment Commission and Larco Leasing, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
  3. Woodsmall v. LyngCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
  4. Berg v. ShearerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
  5. Losey v. RobertsDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1986

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API