DANIEL GRIFFIN v. UNITED STATES
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
FISHER, Associate Judge:
Appellant Daniel Griffin challenges his convictions, arguing that the trial court committed reversible error by omitting part of the first paragraph of this jurisdiction’s standard jury instruction defining reasonable doubt. Finding no plain error, we affirm.
I. Background
Appellant was charged with unlawful possession of a firearm, possession of an unregistered firearm, and unlawful possession of ammunition. On the afternoon before the jury was to be instructed, the court sent its proposed jury instructions to counsel by email. Later that evening, defense counsel…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Sullivan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Victor v. NebraskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Comford v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
- State v. CruzUtah Supreme Court · 2005
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- LAMONT L. BUSKEY and KEITH A. SIMMS v. UNITED STATESDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2016
- Alleyne v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2024
- Bost v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2018
- Darryl Malloy v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2018
- Darryl Malloy v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2018
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.