Legal Opinion

In Re Estate of Doyle

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided November 10, 2005No. 4-04-1026Published

1Opinion of the Court 1

838 N.E.2d 355 (2005)

362 Ill. App.3d 293

297 Ill.Dec. 868

In re the ESTATE OF Mary Rose DOYLE, an Alleged Disabled Adult (James P. Doyle and Gary Eklund, Petitioners-Appellees,

v.

Rose Marie Doyle, Respondent-Appellant).

No. 4-04-1026.

Appellate Court of Illinois, Fourth District.

Argued October 11, 2005.

Decided November 10, 2005.

Rehearing Denied December 5, 2005.

Michael J. Costello (argued), Walter H. Kasten, Springfield, for Rose Marie Doyle.

Elizabeth W. Anderson (argued), Robert M. Shupenus, Brown, Hay & Stephens, LLP, Springfield, for James P. Doyle.

2Opinion of the Court · McCULLOUGHJustice McCULLOUGH

The respondent, Rose Marie Doyle, appeals the…

Also in this document: Dissent.

3Cases cited14 opinions

  1. People v. WoodardIllinois Supreme Court · 1997
  2. People v. LewisIllinois Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Sullivan v. Edward HospitalIllinois Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Hiscott v. PetersAppellate Court of Illinois · 2001
  5. Casson v. NashIllinois Supreme Court · 1978

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API