Legal Opinion · Dissent
Henley v. . Holt
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided May 6, 1942PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1DissentBarnhill, J.
DEVIN, J., joins in dissenting opinion. Civil action to establish a parol trust in lands, tried upon the following issues:
"1. Did the defendants, Floyd H. Holt and wife, Mary Elizabeth Holt, take title to the lands in controversy impressed with a trust in favor of the plaintiff, as alleged in the complaint? Ans.: `No.'
"2. If so, is the plaintiff estopped to assert the said trust, as alleged in the answer? ____________."
From judgment on verdict, the plaintiff appeals, assigning errors. This is the same case that was before us on plaintiff's appeal at the Fall Term, 1938, reported in 214 N.C.…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Speas v. Merchants Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
- Avery v. StewartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
- Ely v. . EarlySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1886
- Harding v. . LongSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889
- Avery v. . StewartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In Re Housing Authority of City of SalisburySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
- Thompson v. . DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
- Maynard v. DURHAM AND SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
- White v. McCarterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
- In Re Housing Authority of City of SalisburySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952