Legal Opinion

Colclough v. Bank of Penfield

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided June 19, 1920No. 1582PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Equitable petition. Before Judge Park. Greene superior court. June 28, 1919.

1Opinion of the CourtFish, C. J.

1. If the fears or affections of a father for his son are wrought upon by threats of a criminal prosecution of the son, and the father is thereby induced and coerced, against his will, to execute his promissory note and a security deed to land in order to prevent such threatened prosecution, there is duress as to the father, even though the threatened prosecution be for a crime which has been committed by the son; and such instruments are void, and may be cancelled in a proper proceeding at the instance of the maker. In such a ease the rule does not apply that if parties voluntarily enter…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Dowling v. DoyleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1920
  2. Williamson v. AckermanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1908
  3. Spires v. WrightSupreme Court of Georgia · 1918
  4. Hodges v. Citizens BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1917
  5. Jordan v. BeecherSupreme Court of Georgia · 1915

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Frost v. FrostSupreme Court of Georgia · 1975
  2. Young v. YoungSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
  3. Bank of Penfield v. ColcloughSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
  4. Hawkes v. MobleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1932
  5. Epps v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1922

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API