Legal Opinion
Belsky v. Lowenthal
New York Court of Appeals
Decided May 31, 1979PublishedCited by 69 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.
The first and third causes of action sounding in malicious prosecution were properly dismissed inasmuch as neither contains any allegation of interference with plaintiffs person or property (Drago v Buonagurio, 46 NY2d 778; Williams v Williams, 23 NY2d 592). The fourth cause of action, characterized by appellant in our court as alleging a claim for prima facie or intentional tort, was likewise properly dismissed by the Appellate Division for the reasons stated in the opinion of Mr. Justice…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Fischer v. MaloneyNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- Williams v. WilliamsNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
- Drago v. BuonagurioNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
3Cited by69 opinions
- Burns Jackson Miller Summit & Spitzer v. LindnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Curiano v. SuozziNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Taylor v. MetzgerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1998
- Gertler v. GoodgoldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Engel v. CBS, INC.New York Court of Appeals · 1999
64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.