Legal Opinion

Leibson v. Taylor

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided January 22, 1987PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*691OPINION OF THE COURT

The procedural nightmare presented by these cases is aggravated by the absence of a complete transcript of the proceedings in the Trial Court. The parties made several attempts to obtain a transcript. An order was obtained from the Court of Appeals requiring the court reporter to produce the transcript; it later ordered the seizure of the court reporter’s stenotype tapes and notes, but the transcription thereof was impossible. A motion was made to hold the Trial Judge (but not the court reporter) in contempt for failing to require the reporter to transcribe the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. United States v. United Mine Workers of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. United States v. NoblesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Taylor v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. United States v. Larry Dickinson and Gibbs AdamsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
  5. The Three FriendsSupreme Court of the United States · 1897

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Cardine v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Commonwealth v. ScottKentucky Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Radford v. LovelaceKentucky Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Shaffer v. MorganKentucky Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Newsome v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2001

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API