Leibson v. Taylor
Kentucky Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
*691OPINION OF THE COURT
The procedural nightmare presented by these cases is aggravated by the absence of a complete transcript of the proceedings in the Trial Court. The parties made several attempts to obtain a transcript. An order was obtained from the Court of Appeals requiring the court reporter to produce the transcript; it later ordered the seizure of the court reporter’s stenotype tapes and notes, but the transcription thereof was impossible. A motion was made to hold the Trial Judge (but not the court reporter) in contempt for failing to require the reporter to transcribe the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. United Mine Workers of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- United States v. NoblesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Taylor v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. Larry Dickinson and Gibbs AdamsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
- The Three FriendsSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Cardine v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2009
- Commonwealth v. ScottKentucky Supreme Court · 2000
- Radford v. LovelaceKentucky Supreme Court · 2006
- Shaffer v. MorganKentucky Supreme Court · 1991
- Newsome v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2001
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.