Still v. Saunders
California Supreme Court
Appeal from the Superior Court of the City of San Francisco. One of the defendants in this case, A. L. Teschiera, having purchased certain premises, in the city of San Francisco, from John H. Still, and afterwards having discovered that Still’s wife set up a claim of homestead therein, attempted to purchase her interest therein, without success.
Read the full summary
Appeal from the Superior Court of the City of San Francisco. One of the defendants in this case, A. L. Teschiera, having purchased certain premises, in the city of San Francisco, from John H. Still, and afterwards having discovered that Still’s wife set up a claim of homestead therein, attempted to purchase her interest therein, without success. A second negotiation was opened, by one Charles R. Saunders, ostensibly in his own name, hut in fact for Teschiera, who agreed to furnish the money, and did do so. Saunders, Still, and wife, finally agreed upon the sum of one thousand dollars. Still…
1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.
The plaintiff, John H. Still, owned certain premises, which he conveyed by deed on the thirteenth of November, 1853, to one Burgess, and Burgess, on the thirteenth day of November, 1853, conveyed the same 'to the defendant Teschiera. At the time the deed was made'to Burgess, Still was a married man, and he and his wife boarded and lodged on the premises with a tenant, to whom they were rented. On the thirteenth day of November, 1854, Still and wife conveyed the premises by'a joint-deed to defendant Saunders, who afterwards conveyed to Teschiera. After the delivery of the deed, and while…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Melone v. RuffinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Sweetser v. DobbinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
- Barrett-Hicks Co. v. GlasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910
- Mantle v. NoyesMontana Supreme Court · 1885
- Smith v. RichardsonUtah Supreme Court · 1880
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.