Smith v. Bratman
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County setting aside a default and judgment. Paul J. McCormick, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtLorigan, J.
The actual parties in this appeal are the same as in the ease of Smith v. Jones, ante, p. 513, [163 Pac. 890], and a similar question is presented for consideration though under different circumstances.
Plaintiff brought suit against a large number of defendants td quiet his alleged title to several tracts land in Los Angeles County, had summons issued therein, and thereafter an affidavit of one V. Mayer was filed in the action in which she swore that she had personally served Prank P. Pisher, one of the defendants in the action, with a summons and copy of the complaint therein in Los Angeles…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Canadian & American Mortgage & Trust Co. v. Clarita Land & Investment Co.California Supreme Court · 1903
- Norton v. Atchison, Topeka, & Santa Fé RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- People ex rel. Schwartz v. TempleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- In Re the Estate & Guardianship of EikerenkotterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Waller v. WestonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Western Pipe & Steel Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926