Legal Opinion
Bowers v. West Virginia Pulp & Paper Co.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided February 4, 1924No. 211PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Per curiam
Remembering that changes in treasury decisions do not change the law, but merely announce a change in the opinion about the law of some official, we are of opinion that the decisions in Edwards v. Wabash Ry. (C. C. A.) 264 Fed. 610, Trumbull Steel Co. v. Routzhan (D. C.) 292 Fed. 1009, and American Laundry, etc., Co. v. Dean (D. C.) 292 Fed. 620, furnish sufficient reasons for affirming this judgment, with costs, without further discussion.
Judgment affirmed accordingly.
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Edwards v. Wabash Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1920
- Trumbull Steel Co. v. RoutzahnDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1923
- American Laundry Machinery Co. v. DeanDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1923
3Cited by5 opinions
- W. T. Grant Co. v. DugganCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1938
- Lake Superior District Power Co. v. Public Service CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1947
- Watts v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1936
- Cuba Railroad v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1925
- W. T. Grant Co. v. DugganDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1937