Legal Opinion

Trumbull Steel Co. v. Routzahn

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided September 22, 1923No. 11950PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WESTENHAVER, District Judge.

The sole question presented is: What issues of stock by a corporation are subject to the stamp tax imposed by sections 1100 and 1107, schedule A, par. 2, War Rev*1010enue Act approved Nov. 23, 1921 (42 Stat. 227, 301, 303; Supplement 1923 U. S. Comp. Stat. § 6318i, 6318p, schedule A, par. 2).

Prior to August 16, 1920, the Trumbull Steel Company had issued and outstanding 131,681 shares of stock, evidenced by certificates of par value of $100 each. On that date, pursuant to sections 8719L-8722, G. C. of Ohio, the company amended its articles of incorporation, changing the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Kepner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  2. United States v. Cerecedo Hermanos Y CompañiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  3. Case of the Sewing MacHine CompaniesSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  4. United States v. G. Falk & BrotherSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  5. Edwards v. Wabash Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1920

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. F. G. Bonfils TrustCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1940
  2. W. T. Grant Co. v. DugganCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1938
  3. Bakelite Corporation v. National Aniline & Chem. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1936
  4. United States v. Pure Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1943
  5. American Gas & Electric Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1946

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API