Legal Opinion

A/S Falkefjell v. Arnold Bernstein Shipping Co.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided November 24, 1953PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

CONGER, District Judge.

The cause was tried upon an agreed statement of facts which follows and which I adopt as my findings of fact herein :

“1. The libelant was and still is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the Kingdom of Norway, with its office and place of business at. Oslo, Norway, and at all material times, was the owner of the Norwegian s/s Tindefjell.
“2. The respondent was and still is a. New York corporation with offices at 17 Battery Place, New York 4, N. Y.
“3. On or about January 16, 1940,. libelant and respondent entered into a contract of charter whereby…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Oceanic Steam Navigation Co. v. Compania Transatlantica EspanolaNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  2. Accinanto, Limited v. Cosmopolitan Shipping Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1951
  3. Field Line (Cardiff), Ltd. v. South Atlantic S. S. LineCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1912
  4. Mallory S. S. Co. v. GarfieldCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1926
  5. Van Santen v. . Standard Oil CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1880

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. The Falkefjell (Olsen & Ugelstad, Managers), Libellant-Appellant v. Arnold Bernstein Shipping Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API