Legal Opinion
Accinanto, Limited v. Cosmopolitan Shipping Co.
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided August 7, 1951No. 3028, 3035, 3037, 3053, 3058, 3060PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CHESNUT, District Judge.
These consolidated admiralty cases require consideration of sections 1303 and 1304 of the Carriage of Goods by Sea Act, (hereinafter sometimes referred to as C.G.S.A.) 46 U.S.C.A. §§ 1300-1315, and their proper application to the facts of the cases. I have separately made findings of fact including the more important evidentiary facts; but for the purposes of this opinion, in stating my conclusions of law, it will be sufficient to state only undisputed facts and the ultimate facts as found without evidentiary detail.
The libellants in the six cases were the shippers,…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Bank Line, Ltd. v. PorterCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1928
- Ore Steamship Corporation v. D/SA/S HasselCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
- J. Aron & Co. v. DannebrogCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1923
- Lutz v. Van Heynigen Brokerage Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1917
- Cornec v. Baltimore & OR Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1931
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Gibboney v. WrightCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
- Petition of United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1952
- A/s J. Ludwig Mowinckels Rederi v. Accinanto, LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1952
- Gibboney v. WrightCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
- Petition of Republic of FranceDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1959
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.