Legal Opinion

Purdy v. Farmers Ins. Co. of Idaho

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided January 24, 2003No. 28023PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EISMANN, Justice.

This is an appeal from the judgment of the district court dismissing a bad faith claim against Farmers Insurance Company of Idaho. Because there was no coverage under the insurance policy, we affirm the judgment.

I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Farmers Insurance Company of Idaho (Farmers Insurance) issued a policy of car insurance to Curtis Purdy under which both he and his wife Beth were insureds. On August 23, 1997, during the term of the policy, Beth Purdy was severely injured while she was a passenger in a car owned and operated by her mother. While stopped because of a…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Infanger v. City of SalmonIdaho Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Moss v. Mid-American Fire & Marine InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Casey v. Highlands InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Mid-Century Insurance v. GardnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  5. Rodriguez v. Department of CorrectionIdaho Supreme Court · 2001

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Weinstein v. Prudential Property & Casualty InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Estate of Becker v. CallahanIdaho Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Swanson v. Beco Const. Co., Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Steel Farms, Inc. v. Croft & Reed, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Lynch v. Shelter Mutual Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2010

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API