Legal Opinion

Fuchs v. Rural Electric Convenience Cooperative, Inc.

District Court, C.D. Illinois

Decided October 30, 1987No. 86-3031PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ORDER

MILLS, District Judge:

Is the Illinois Electric Supplier Act unconstitutional?

Does the power service agreement thereunder violate the Sherman Antitrust Act?

No — to both inquiries.

This action is before the Court on Rural Electric Convenience Cooperative’s motion for summary judgment and Central Illinois Public Service Company’s motion to dismiss under Fed.R.Civ.P. 56 & 12(b)(6) respectively. The pertinent facts are not disputed, and these motions are consolidated for purposes of ruling.

I

Central Illinois Public Service Company (CIPS) is a public utility regulated by the Illinois…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Parker v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. California Retail Liquor Dealers Assn. v. Midcal Aluminum, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. City of Lafayette v. Louisiana Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Town of Hallie v. City of Eau ClaireSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Arkansas Electric Cooperative Corp. v. Arkansas Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Fuchs v. Rural Electric Convenience Cooperative Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
  2. Central Illinois Public Service Co. v. Illinois Commerce CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1990
  3. Fuchs v. Rural Electric Convenience Cooperative Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API