State ex rel. Gainer v. West Virginia Board of Investments
West Virginia Supreme Court
1DissentNeely, Senior Justice
The majority opinion is well reasoned and elicits great respect from me. Nonetheless, I dissent because I don’t believe that our Constitution compels the majority’s conclusion. As the majority opinion forthrightly recognizes, the purpose of W.Va. Const. Art. X, § 6 was to prevent state government from helping selected private businesses when those businesses had powerful political allies. W.Va. Const. Art. X, § 6 was written long before state-managed pension plans presented the problem of sustaining the inflation-adjusted value of massive amounts of accumulated capital.
The State now manages…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Booth v. SimsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1995
- Winkler v. State School Building AuthorityWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1993
- State Ex Rel. Marockie v. WagonerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1994
- State Ex Rel. Marockie v. WagonerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. Morgan Stanley & Co., Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1995
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.