Legal Opinion · Dissent

State ex rel. Gainer v. West Virginia Board of Investments

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided May 31, 1995No. 22574Published

1DissentNeely, Senior Justice

The majority opinion is well reasoned and elicits great respect from me. Nonetheless, I dissent because I don’t believe that our Constitution compels the majority’s conclusion. As the majority opinion forthrightly recognizes, the purpose of W.Va. Const. Art. X, § 6 was to prevent state government from helping selected private businesses when those businesses had powerful political allies. W.Va. Const. Art. X, § 6 was written long before state-managed pension plans presented the problem of sustaining the inflation-adjusted value of massive amounts of accumulated capital.

The State now manages…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Booth v. SimsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Winkler v. State School Building AuthorityWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1993
  3. State Ex Rel. Marockie v. WagonerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1994
  4. State Ex Rel. Marockie v. WagonerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1993
  5. State v. Morgan Stanley & Co., Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1995

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API