Booth v. Sims
West Virginia Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
NEELY, Chief Justice:
This mandamus proceeding presents the question whether certain 1994 amendments to our State’s public safety pension plan impair the obligations of contract under art. Ill, § 4 of the West Virginia Constitution. We granted a rule to show cause to set the law in clear and unambiguous terms concerning the pension rights of thousands of West Virginia public employees who have given their lives to government service and now rely for their future health, welfare and security upon the promises made to them by their fellow citizens through the elected legislature. For the reasons…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Elrod v. BurnsSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Branti v. FinkelSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Dadisman v. MooreWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1989
- Singer v. City of TopekaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1980
- State Ex Rel. Fox v. Board of Trustees of the Policemen's Pension or Relief FundWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1964
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by76 opinions
- State v. RodoussakisWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1998
- Gribben v. KirkWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1995
- Oregon State Police Officers' Ass'n v. StateOregon Supreme Court · 1996
- Marcus v. HolleyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2005
- Estate of Verba Ex Rel. Nolan v. GhapheryWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2001
71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.