Legal Opinion

State v. Gilden

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided June 15, 2001No. Appeal No. C-000276, Trial No. B-9907351PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Doan, Presiding Judge.

Following a jury trial, defendant-appellant, Antwaun Gilden, was convicted of burglary pursuant to R.C. 2911.12(A)(4). During the trial, the court permitted jurors to ask questions of the witnesses by submitting them in writing. Then, out of the jury’s hearing, the court discussed whether the questions were proper with the attorneys. If the court determined that they were proper, it questioned the witness accordingly.

On appeal, Gilden presents six assignments of error for review. However, because the last of these assignments of error is dispositive of the appeal, we…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  2. State v. JenksOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Morrison v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
  4. DeBenedetto v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1985
  5. Commonwealth v. BrittoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2001

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. FisherOhio Supreme Court · 2003
  2. People v. MilliganColorado Court of Appeals · 2003
  3. Ex Parte MaloneSupreme Court of Alabama · 2008
  4. State v. FisherOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Ex Parte MaloneSupreme Court of Alabama · 2008

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API