Legal Opinion

Davis v. Hubbard

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided September 16, 1980No. C 73-205PublishedCited by 60 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

WALINSKI, District Judge:

PRELIMINARY STATEMENT

This is the third in a series of Orders addressing the single-judge issues herein. 1 Said orders shall serve as the Court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law, pursuant to Rule 52, F.R.Civ.P.

ISSUES PRESENTED

ISSUE 5: WHETHER THE METHODS USED BY THE PROFESSIONAL STAFF TO CLINICALLY EVALUATE AND DIAGNOSE PATIENTS AT LIMA STATE HOSPITAL IS A VIOLATION OF THE FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT. THIS IS MEANT TO INCLUDE, BUT IS NOT LIMITED TO, TESTING, LACK OF TREATMENT, LACK OF PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS OF THE STAFF.

A review of the subissues…

2Cases cited80 opinions

  1. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by60 opinions

  1. Daniel Howard Bee v. Dr. Keith Greaves, Medic Keith Hughes and Dr. Robert GreerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1984
  2. Shari Guertin v. State of Mich.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019
  3. Mills v. RogersSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Rivers v. KatzNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  5. In re C.E.Illinois Supreme Court · 1994

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API