Davis v. Hubbard
District Court, N.D. Ohio
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
WALINSKI, District Judge:
PRELIMINARY STATEMENT
This is the third in a series of Orders addressing the single-judge issues herein. 1 Said orders shall serve as the Court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law, pursuant to Rule 52, F.R.Civ.P.
ISSUES PRESENTED
ISSUE 5: WHETHER THE METHODS USED BY THE PROFESSIONAL STAFF TO CLINICALLY EVALUATE AND DIAGNOSE PATIENTS AT LIMA STATE HOSPITAL IS A VIOLATION OF THE FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT. THIS IS MEANT TO INCLUDE, BUT IS NOT LIMITED TO, TESTING, LACK OF TREATMENT, LACK OF PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS OF THE STAFF.
A review of the subissues…
2Cases cited80 opinions
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by60 opinions
- Daniel Howard Bee v. Dr. Keith Greaves, Medic Keith Hughes and Dr. Robert GreerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1984
- Shari Guertin v. State of Mich.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019
- Mills v. RogersSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Rivers v. KatzNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- In re C.E.Illinois Supreme Court · 1994
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.