State v. LaFlamme
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Defendant was found guilty on an indictment for maintaining a liquor nuisance. After verdict, respondent filed a motion in arrest of judgment. Motion overruled.. Exceptions were filed by respondent. Case stated in opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtCornish, J.
Indictment for maintaining a liquor nuisance at Bumford in the County of Oxford. The respondent was tried at the May term, 1916, and convicted. After verdict he filed a motion in arrest of judgment which was overruled by the presiding Justice. The case is before this court on exceptions to that ruling.
The typewritten caption of the indictment alleges that it was found at a term of the Supreme Judicial Court “begun and holden at Paris within and for the County of Oxford on the second Tuesday of October in the year of our Lord one thousand nine hundred and fieteen.” It is contended by the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Grant v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1876
- Holland v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1914
- State v. LockwoodSupreme Court of Vermont · 1886
- Smith v. Territory of OklahomaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1904
- Hogue v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1912
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. SmithSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1944
- Logan v. StateSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1970
- State v. OsborneSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1959
- Gamblin v. StateSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1971
- Roberts v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1928
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.