Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Motta

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided March 22, 1993No. 91-P-1280PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

On appeal from his conviction for trafficking in cocaine, the defendant alleges error in the denial of his motion to suppress. He contends that the reliability of the informant who furnished the information for the issuance of a search warrant was not established. We agree and reverse his conviction.

Here, the affiant stated that the informant had furnished information which had led to the arrest of two named individuals for possession of cocaine with intent to distribute. This statement standing alone was insufficient to establish the reliability of the informant. Commonwealth v. Rojas, 403…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. LyonsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
  2. Commonwealth v. RojasMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1988
  3. Commonwealth v. GermainMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
  4. Commonwealth v. BakoianMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992
  5. Commonwealth v. SpanoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1993

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. LubiejewskiMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2000
  2. Commonwealth v. WatsonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1994
  3. Commonwealth v. HillMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2001
  4. Commonwealth v. KennedyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1997
  5. Commonwealth v. LittigMassachusetts Superior Court · 2005

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API