Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Littig

Massachusetts Superior Court

Decided May 11, 2005No. 040373Published

1Opinion of the Court

Fabricant, Judith, J.

The defendant is charged with trafficking in cocaine in an amount in excess of fourteen grams. He moves to suppress evidence seized as a result of a search of his apartment pursuant to a warrant. After hearing, and review of the affidavit in support of the warrant application, the Court concludes that the motion must be allowed, as the affidavit failed to provide probable cause to believe that contraband would be found in the defendant’s apartment.

THE CONTENTS OF THE AFFIDAVIT

On March 5, 2004, Canton Police Detective Paul Gallagher applied for and received a warrant to…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Commonwealth v. UptonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
  4. Commonwealth v. CinelliMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
  5. Commonwealth v. MontanezMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API