Legal Opinion

Kerr v. Burns

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided January 15, 1908No. 5264; No. 2893 C. APublishedCited by 13 opinions

Error to the District Court of La Plata County. Hon. James L. Russell, Judge. Action by Thomas D. Burns, Mary Callen, A. J. Buchanan, J. W. McCaw and Edgar Buchanan against Thomas A. Kerr and Erwin W. Mead. From the decree, defendant Kerr brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Helm

The most important objection presented by the record before us rests upon the assertion of counsel *288for plaintiff in error that the complaint filed herein fails to state a cause of action. This contention would, if true, of course, nullify the proceedings below and require a reversal of the judgment entered upon such complaint.

The present action is in equity; it is based upon the refusal of plaintiff in error and another to comply with a decree entered in 1897, adjudicating water priorities to appropriators from Hermosa creek, in La Plata county; such refusal resulting in injury to defendants…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Arthur v. IsraelSupreme Court of Colorado · 1890
  2. Handy Ditch Co. v. South Side Ditch Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1899
  3. Doll v. StewartSupreme Court of Colorado · 1902
  4. Kerr v. DudleySupreme Court of Colorado · 1899
  5. People ex rel. Brown v. District CourtSupreme Court of Colorado · 1899

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. People v. PennIllinois Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Estate of Lee v. GraberSupreme Court of Colorado · 1969
  3. Weiland v. Reorganized Catlin Consolidated Canal Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1916
  4. Van Buskirk v. Red Buttes Land & Livestock Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Reyher v. MayneSupreme Court of Colorado · 1932

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API