Legal Opinion

Melton v. Donnell

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided March 5, 1938PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McKinney

By the bill complainants seek to enjoin the defendant from erecting gates across a road in which they have acquired an easement. We quote from the answer as follows: “complainants have an easement over said road and acquired the same by prescription of fifty years or more.”

The chancellor held that defendant had a right to place gates across said road, notwithstanding this long adverse user by complainants without gates; and held, further, that this was not a proper cause in which to weigh the relative convenience or inconvenience of the parties, and dismissed the bill.

The Court of Appeals…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Rogerson v. ShepherdWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Fankboner v. CorderIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Long v. MayberryTennessee Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Luster v. GarnerTennessee Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Puryear v. ClementsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1874

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Foshee v. BrigmanTennessee Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Massee v. SchillerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1967
  3. Cooper v. PolosCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1995
  4. Current v. StevensonTennessee Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Huter v. BirkSupreme Court of Missouri · 1974

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API