Legal Opinion

Redmond v. Commonwealth

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 2, 1980No. Appeal, No. 1890 C.D. 1979PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Rogers,

This is Bertha Redmond’s appeal from an order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Board) denying her workmen’s compensation benefits. We affirm.

Mrs. Redmond filed a claim petition alleging that she injured her back in the course of her duties as a sewing machine operator, more particularly, while moving a bundle of dresses. Medical examination revealed a herniated spinal disc and it is uncontested that, at the time of the hearing before the referee in September 1978, Mrs. Redmond was disabled.

However, the evidence before the referee as to the origin of the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Universal Cyclops Steel Corp. v. KrawczynskiCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  2. D & T Brooks, Inc. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  3. Haas v. KasnotSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  4. St. Denis v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  5. Redevelopment Authority v. CohenCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Lehman v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  2. Wynn v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. Aversa v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  4. Hill v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  5. Bush v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API