Legal Opinion

State v. Hames

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided May 17, 2005No. COA04-968PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TIMMONS-GOODSON, Judge.

Arthur Hames (“defendant”) appeals his convictions for voluntary manslaughter of his brother, assault with a deadly weapon inflicting serious injury upon Stephanie Marzette (“Marzette”), and attempted voluntary manslaughter of Marzette. For the reasons discussed herein, we hold that defendant received a trial free of prejudicial error with respect to the voluntary manslaughter conviction. However, because we conclude that the offenses of assault with a deadly weapon inflicting serious injury and attempted voluntary manslaughter are mutually exclusive, we hold that…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Ball v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. State v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  3. State v. ReidSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
  4. State v. SpeckmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
  5. State v. KnoxCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. Chang YangCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
  2. State v. MumfordCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
  3. State v. Jihad Rashid MelvinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
  4. State v. JettCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API