Legal Opinion

Northpoint Homeowners Assn. v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 24, 1979No. Civ. 46627PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CHRISTIAN, J.

Northpoint Homeowners Association seeks a writ of mandate commanding respondent court to vacate its protective order or to require real party in interest Ditz-Crane to provide an undertaking to protect petitioner from being harmed by the protective order.

Ditz-Crane contracted to design, construct and maintain townhouses operated and controlled by petitioner. Petitioner sued Ditz-Crane for breach of contract, breach of warranty and negligence. The complaint alleged faulty design and construction of the roofing of the townhouses and negligent landscaping on the property. As…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Union Oil Co. v. Reconstruction Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Oksner v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  3. Federal Automotive Services v. Lane Buick Co.California Court of Appeal · 1962
  4. Miller v. Santa Margarita Land & Cattle Co.California Court of Appeal · 1963

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Dodge, Warren & Peter Insurance Service, Inc. v. RileyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
  2. In Re Marriage of Van HookCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  3. Condor Enterprises, Ltd. v. Valley View State BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API