Legal Opinion

Test v. Heaberlin

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided November 13, 1962No. 50677PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGarfield, C. J.

— This is a law action on a promissory note for $1000 signed by defendant Heaberlin, payable to plaintiff Test. At the conclusion of the evidence the trial court directed a verdict for plaintiff. From judgment thereon defendant has appealed.

The errors assigned and argued may fairly be reduced to two: that a jury issue was presented on defendant’s plea (1) there was no valid consideration for the note and (2) the note was obtained by fraud.

Defendant’s former wife Mae was granted a divorce from him May 6, 1959. Plaintiff was Mae’s attorney. In the divorce proceeding she obtained judgment for…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Butler Manufacturing Co. v. Elliott & CoxSupreme Court of Iowa · 1930
  2. Rodgers v. ReinkingSupreme Court of Iowa · 1928
  3. National Bank of Decorah v. RobisonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1925
  4. Storck v. PascoeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1955
  5. United States Hoffman MacHinery Corp. v. CarlsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1961

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Federal Land Bank of Omaha v. WoodsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1992
  2. Bates v. Allied Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1991
  3. Kunkle Water & Electric, Inc. v. City of PrescottSupreme Court of Iowa · 1984
  4. Phipps v. Winneshiek CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1999
  5. Mills County State Bank v. FisherSupreme Court of Iowa · 1979

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API