Mills County State Bank v. Fisher
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
REES, Justice.
The defendant, Stanley Fisher, appeals from a judgment for the plaintiff Bank in its action on a promissory note and against defendant on his counterclaim alleging fraudulent misrepresentation. The judgment of the trial court was affirmed by the Court of Appeals. We granted defendant’s petition for review and conclude that errors made by the trial court in instructing the jury require the grant of a new trial.
Fisher contends that the trial court made numerous errors in the course of his trial, all but one of these alleged errors relating to the court’s instructions to the jury.…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Klein v. First Edina National BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
- B & B Asphalt Co. v. T. S. McShane Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1976
- FIRST NATIONAL BANK IN LENOX v. BrownSupreme Court of Iowa · 1970
- Committee on Professional Ethics & Conduct of the Iowa State Bar Ass'n v. DurhamSupreme Court of Iowa · 1979
- Frederick v. ShormanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1966
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Cornell v. WunschelSupreme Court of Iowa · 1987
- Lockard v. CarsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1980
- Kunkle Water & Electric, Inc. v. City of PrescottSupreme Court of Iowa · 1984
- Sedco International, S. A. v. CoryDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 1981
- Phipps v. Winneshiek CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1999
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.