Legal Opinion
Peek v. Department of Aging
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided April 26, 2005PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
Senior Judge KELLEY.
Mary Peek (Peek) petitions for review of a decision of the Pennsylvania Department of Aging (Department) affirming the termination of enrollment in a prescription drug benefit program through the Pharmaceutical Assistance Contract for the Elderly (PACE). 1 We affirm.
Peek, a senior citizen and resident of Pennsylvania, submitted a 2003 new enrollment application, dated June 17, 2003, to the Department’s PACE program, seeking assistance with prescription drug expenses, Eligibility for PACE is based upon age, Pennsylvania residency, and income. Based upon income…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Pelton v. Com., Dept. of Public WelfareSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Scanlon v. Department of Public WelfareCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Pennsylvania Department of Health v. North Hills Passavant HospitalCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Clough v. Tax Review BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Thompson v. Department of Public WelfareCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
3Cited by2 opinions
- Johnson v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- D.M. v. Department of Public WelfareCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2015