Legal Opinion

Scanlon v. Department of Public Welfare

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 19, 1999PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JIULIANTE, Senior Judge.

Catharine R. Scanlon (Scanlon) petitions for review from the March 1,1999 order of the Department of Public Welfare (DPW) that adopted in its entirety the recommendation of the Bureau of Hearings and Appeals to deny Scanlon’s appeal of the Department of Aging’s (PDA) May 14, 1998 determination denying her application for PACE 1 benefits. We affirm.

On May 9, 1998, Scanlon filed an application for the renewal of PACE benefits for the year 1998. (Reproduced Record “R.R.” 37a). In her application for benefits, Scanlon reported that she had received $10,893.00 in social…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bethenergy Mines Inc. v. Commonwealth, Department of Environmental ProtectionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  2. Meier v. MaleskiCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  3. Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. FosterCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  4. Oriolo v. Pennsylvania Department of Public WelfareCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  5. Chartiers Community Mental Health & Retardation Center, Inc. v. Department of Public WelfareCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Rosen v. Bureau of Professional and Occupational AffairsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  2. Allegheny County Sportsmen's League v. RendellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  3. Davis v. Pennsylvania Department of Public WelfareCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  4. Dee-Dee Cab, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  5. Steller v. Pennsylvania Securities CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API