Legal Opinion

MacKe v. Pierce

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided May 23, 2003No. S-02-983PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMiller-Lerman, J.

NATURE OF CASE

This is the second appearance of this case before this court. Kelly Macke sued Eddie Pierce, M.D., alleging that Pierce tortiously interfered with a business expectancy when Pierce disclosed to Burlington Northern Railroad Company (BNRR), Macke’s prospective employer, findings Pierce made during a physical examination of Macke. After Pierce’s disclosure, Macke’s employment application with BNRR was disapproved. A jury returned a verdict in favor of Pierce. Prior to the entry of judgment on the jury verdict, Macke filed a motion for new trial, which was sustained by the district…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Huff v. SwartzNebraska Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Holmes v. Crossroads Joint VentureNebraska Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Rush v. WilderNebraska Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Koster v. P & P ENTERPRISES, INC.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Jones v. MeyerNebraska Supreme Court · 1999

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Gieseke v. IDCA, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
  2. Aon Consulting v. Midlands FinancialNebraska Supreme Court · 2008
  3. BARON FINANCIAL CORP. v. NatanzonDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2006
  4. Lewison v. RennerNebraska Supreme Court · 2018
  5. Perry Lumber Co. v. Durable Services, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2003

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API