MacKe v. Pierce
Nebraska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMiller-Lerman, J.
NATURE OF CASE
This is the second appearance of this case before this court. Kelly Macke sued Eddie Pierce, M.D., alleging that Pierce tortiously interfered with a business expectancy when Pierce disclosed to Burlington Northern Railroad Company (BNRR), Macke’s prospective employer, findings Pierce made during a physical examination of Macke. After Pierce’s disclosure, Macke’s employment application with BNRR was disapproved. A jury returned a verdict in favor of Pierce. Prior to the entry of judgment on the jury verdict, Macke filed a motion for new trial, which was sustained by the district…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Huff v. SwartzNebraska Supreme Court · 2000
- Holmes v. Crossroads Joint VentureNebraska Supreme Court · 2001
- Rush v. WilderNebraska Supreme Court · 2002
- Koster v. P & P ENTERPRISES, INC.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1995
- Jones v. MeyerNebraska Supreme Court · 1999
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Gieseke v. IDCA, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
- Aon Consulting v. Midlands FinancialNebraska Supreme Court · 2008
- BARON FINANCIAL CORP. v. NatanzonDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2006
- Lewison v. RennerNebraska Supreme Court · 2018
- Perry Lumber Co. v. Durable Services, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2003
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.