Legal Opinion
FJK Associates v. Karkoski
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided March 2, 1999No. AC 17794PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SULLIVAN, J.
The defendant tenant appeals from a judgment for the plaintiff landlord in a summary process action seeking possession of the subject premises for nonpayment of rent and lapse of time. The dispositive issue on appeal is whether the trial court improperly found that the plaintiff sustained its burden of proof on its lapse of time claim. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The parties entered into a written lease agreement for one year on or about December 12,1994. The written lease terminated on December 31, 1995, by its terms. *67After January 1, 1996, the defendant paid…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Webb v. AmblerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1939
- Welk v. BidwellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1950
- Williams v. Apothecaries Hall Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1908
- Corthouts v. Connecticut Fire Safety Services Corp.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1963
- Hour Publishing Co. v. GorezConnecticut Appellate Court · 1968
3Cited by3 opinions
- Tinaco Plaza, LLC v. Freebob's, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- Meeker v. MahonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2016
- Hill v. Purdy, No. Cv 18-8661 (Dec. 4, 2002)Connecticut Superior Court · 2002